At risk individuals
11/15/2005 England S. Scott & M. McGurk British Dental Journal (2005); 199, 585. doi: 10.1038 Research Letters: Sir, we read with interest the article by McLeod et al. on delays in the diagnosis of oral cancer. An assumption of the paper is that reducing diagnostic delays will reduce tumour stage at diagnosis. The current literature indicates there is no significant association between duration of diagnostic delay and stage of oral cancer at diagnosis, suggesting advanced stage disease is not always a consequence of delayed diagnosis (delay being defined as the period from the onset of symptoms to receipt of a definitive diagnosis). We have investigated this relationship in a consecutive cohort of patients (n = 250) presenting to Guy's Hospital Head and Neck Service, with squamous cell carcinoma of the oral cavity. Although just over half the cohort followed the logical delay-stage relationship (29% had no delay and early stage disease, while 24% had a long delay and had advanced stage disease), 27% paradoxically had no delay yet had advanced stage disease and 20% had a prolonged diagnostic delay yet had early stage disease. It is suggested the paradox is due to different rates of tumour growth. However the time durations involved are simply not long enough for a squamous cell carcinoma to develop from an early lesion into late stage disease. A more plausible explanation (but one which has received relatively little attention) is that some oral cancers may be silent (asymptomatic) until late in the disease period. Conversely, [...]