1/5/2006 New York, NY Ellen Simon cantonrep.com Margot Morrell viewed her 2004 ovarian cancer diagnosis as a challenge. “From the minute I was diagnosed, my focus was completely on how do I get over this as fast as possible so I can get back to work,” said Morrell, an author and speaker. More than one-third of the women in America and almost half the men will be diagnosed with cancer sometime in their lives, and for many, the diagnosis will come while they’re working — literally. Many patients hear the diagnosis for the first time when their doctor phones at work. Most continue working while they’re treated. According to a study of 1,433 cancer patients ages 25 to 62 published in the journal “Cancer,” about 59 percent of men and 61 percent of women continued working during cancer treatment. Of those who stopped working, most returned to work the first year after treatment. “Most people want to keep working,” said Barbara Hoffman, a founding board member of the National Coalition for Cancer Survivorship. “Most people, if they are really not able to work will say, ‘I can’t come in this week, or this month, or these four months,’ but they really want to reintegrate to work when they are able to.” Health Insurance Factor One reason: Health insurance. Cathy J. Bradley, of the Massey Cancer Center at Virginia Commonwealth University in Richmond is studying cancer treatment and work. She found that 38 percent of prostate cancer patients said they kept [...]

1/4/2006 Bethesda, MD Vicki Brower Journal of the National Cancer Institute, Vol. 98, No. 1, 9-11, January 4, 2006 In October, the National Cancer Institute made its first nanotechnology research awards worth $33.3 million to 12 research groups and seven hubs. A month later, at the Molecular Targets and Cancer Therapeutics meeting in Philadelphia, a press conference devoted exclusively to nanotechnology highlighted several experimental studies using nanoparticles, including a liposome–nanoparticle gene therapy designed to home in on and kill cancer cells wherever they are throughout the body. Nanotechnology's potential application to cancer seems to be in the news almost weekly, with new uses of the technology for diagnosis and treatment moving rapidly from the lab toward clinical trials. But along with several promising discoveries have come unanswered questions about nanotechnology's safety for human health and the environment. Since the discovery of carbon nanotubes and their unusual properties in 1991, the hope for and hype of nanotechnology's potential to better diagnose and treat cancer have blossomed. In September 2004, the NCI initiated a comprehensive 5-year, $144.3 million research effort, the Alliance for Nanotechnology in Cancer, to develop and translate cancer-related nanotechnology research into clinical practice. Its first awards were $7 million to the Cancer Nanotechnology Platform Partnerships and $26.3 million to seven Centers of Cancer Nanotechnology Excellence, and they span a wide range of technologies and cancer types. Projects funded include developing applications to treat multidrug-resistant tumors, early cancer detection using nanoprobes targeted to angiogenic signatures, DNA-linked dendrimer nanoparticles for diagnosis [...]

1/3/2006 Fort Lee, NJ staff BusinessWeek Online (www.businessweek.com) Researchers have learned caution, and some of the early results are promising. When Matthew During and Michael Kaplitt first went hunting for capital to commercialize their research in gene therapy, their timing couldn't have been worse. It was the fall of 1999, just after teenager Jesse Gelsinger died in a clinical trial of gene therapy -- the use of genes to deliver medicines to diseased cells. Together, During and Kaplitt were able to scrape up an initial $2.5 million. "Maybe we were arrogant to think we could start something at that time," Kaplitt concedes. Today, the two physician founders of Neurologix Inc., in Fort Lee, N.J., are feeling much more upbeat. They're searching for $10 million to fund a pivotal trial in Parkinson's disease, and they expect to find it. Others are also prospecting in the once-neglected field of gene therapy. On Nov. 7, Colgate-Palmolive Inc. (CL ) invested $20 million in Austin-based Introgen Therapeutics Inc. (INGN ), which is pursuing novel remedies for oral cancer. And the Michael J. Fox Foundation is about to award its first ever grant for gene therapy research. The $750,000 will go to San Diego-based Ceregene Inc. (CEGE ), which, like Neurologix, is zeroing in on a treatment for Parkinson's, the disease that afflicts actor Fox. Ceregene also raised $32 million in venture capital last year. Recent success stories in clinics and labs add to the sense that gene therapy is moving back into the mainstream. [...]

1/3/2006 South Carolina Thomas Walle et al. Drug Metab. Dispos., December 28, 2005 Oral cancer, originating from smoking-induced lesions of the basal cells in the complex stratified oral epithelium, is difficult to treat. Early detection of premalignant lesions, e.g., leukoplakia, has suggested the possibility of chemopreventive measures, such as topical application of antimutagenic/antiproliferative dietary or pharmaceutical agents. As an extension of a study in human oral epithelial cell monolayers, we determined carcinogen, i.e. benzo[a]pyrene (BaP), transport, bioactivation and DNA binding in a bioengineered human gingival epithelial tissue construct and the chemopreventive effects of dietary polyphenols. Short-term experiments showed that both types of compounds can traverse this tissue as well as be effectively taken up by the tissue. The model cigarette smoke carcinogen BaP very slowly, but to a great extent, accumulated in the tissue with maximal uptake at 24 h. Such exposure clearly resulted in DNA binding of BaP by the tissue. This DNA binding was associated with BaP-induced cytochrome P450 (CYP) 1B1 as well as CYP1A1 expression, as evidenced by mRNA measurements. Co-treatment of the oral tissue with dietary polyphenols, including resveratrol and quercetin, and BaP, resulted in significant inhibition of the BaP-DNA binding. Using fluorescence microscopy as well as simultaneous autoradiography, we also demonstrated that quercetin indeed penetrates the entire stratified tissue layer, but that quercetin was also oxidized within the cells. Thus, this bioengineered oral tissue construct opens up improved ways of understanding and preventing/treating smoking-induced oral cancer. Authors: Thomas Walle, U Kristina Walle, David Sedmera, and [...]

1/3/2006 Copenhagen, Denmark press release PRNewswire (www.prnewswire.com) Genmab A/S announced today that HuMax-EGFr has been designated a Fast Track Product by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA). This designation covers patients with head and neck cancer who have previously failed standard therapies. Genmab presented positive results from the Phase I/II study of HuMax-EGFr in May 2005. Fast Track Product status allows the FDA to facilitate the development and expedite the review of a drug if it is intended for the treatment of a serious or life-threatening condition, and if it demonstrates the potential to address unmet medical needs for such a condition. This fast track designation gives Genmab the opportunity to submit a Biologics License Application (BLA) in sequential sections, and have these sections reviewed as they are submitted, thus saving development time. A BLA is the biologic products' equivalent to a New Drug Application and is the final stage before a drug is approved for the market by the FDA. Fast track status also opens the possibility for receiving a priority review or accelerated approval of the BLA where the review time would be halved to just 6 months. "We are very pleased that HuMax-EGFr has been designated a Fast Track product and is now poised to move forward to pivotal studies which we hope to begin this year," said Lisa N. Drakeman, Ph.D., Chief Executive Officer of Genmab. About HuMax-EGFr HuMax-EGFr is a fully human, high-affinity antibody targeted at the Epidermal Growth Factor receptor (EGFr). EGFr is [...]

1/3/2006 Baltimore, MD Britt C Reid, R Gary Rozier Oral Oncol, December 20, 2005 This study investigated whether receiving continuous regular care with the same primary care provider had an independent association with stage at diagnosis for head and neck cancers (HNCA) in a Medicare population. The study database (N=10,662) linked files from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Program 1991-2000 for patients with cancers of the oral cavity, pharynx, and larynx with their files from the Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services Program. Continuity of care displayed a statistically significant independent association and dose-response pattern with stage at diagnosis when the provider was an internist but not a general or family physician. An independent statistically significant association between continuity of care with an internist and stage at diagnosis was found for oral cavity tumors (adjusted odds ratio [AOR]=0.85; 95%CI=0.73-0.99), but not pharyngeal tumors (AOR=1.02; 95%CI=0.74-1.41). Laryngeal tumors were borderline statistically significant at p-value=0.07 (AOR=0.84; 95%CI=0.69-1.02). Regular continuous care from the same primary care provider displayed an independent association with early diagnosis of HNCA when the anatomic site was the oral cavity and the provider was an internist, but not when the provider was a general or family physician. Primary care physicians including general/family physicians may represent a relevant group for encouraging increased opportunistic HNCA screening efforts among their patients. Authors affiliation: Department of Health Promotion and Policy, Health Services Research Program, Room 3A-08, School of Dentistry, University of Maryland

1/2/2006 London, England staff Daily Mail (www.dailymail.co.uk) We all know the scary headlines - smoking causes lung disease, stroke, oral cancer and heart disease. That's probably why you want to quit but you've known all those risks for months - if not years - already, so will that alone make a difference? The fact is smoking is responsible for a whole range of conditions - from extra wrinkles to fertility - that you probably didn't even know about. Here we highlight these lesser known facts in our print-and-keep guide. Have it by your side at all times and read any time you think of having a smoke. Hopefully it will give you the resolve you need... Smoking - the lesser known facts -Every cigarette takes 11 minutes off your life. -Smokers in their 40s have as many facial wrinkles as non-smokers in their 60s. -In Britain, one person is diagnosed with lung cancer - the cancer most commonly associated with smoking - every 15 minutes. -114,000 people die every year from smoking. That's 312 every day. -Smoking gives you yellow teeth, bad breath and hollow cheeks from repeated sucking on cigarettes. -Around half of all regular smokers will eventually be killed by their habit. -Female smokers have a 30 per cent lower fertility rate than non-smokers. -Male smokers are 50 per cent more likely to be impotent. -Around 450 children start smoking every day. -Men who smoke around their pregnant partner can significantly harm their unborn child. -Women who smoke [...]

1/2/2006 California Christian Nordqvist Medical News Today (www.medicalnewstoday.com) If you want to lower your chances of developing cancer you should increase your intake of vitamin D, say researchers from the University of California. High vitamin D intake is associated with significantly lower risks of developing cancer of the colon, ovary and breast, say the researchers. The team, led by Dr C Garland, looked at 63 different studies dating from 1966 to 2004. Their conclusion is that the link is too strong to ignore. They even went as far as to say that nothing else protects you from cancer so effectively. You can read about this study in the American Journal of Public Health. The researchers say an enormous number of cancers can be attributed to not enough vitamin D. The best source of vitamin D is sunlight. If you do not have access to sunlight all year round, as is the case in many northern countries, the researchers advise taking a supplement - raising your intake to 1000 IUs (international units) per day.

12/30/2005 London, UK Stig Bengmark, MD, Ph. D. Journal of Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition, Vol. 30, No. 1, 2006 45-51 Background: The world suffers a tsunami of chronic diseases, and a typhoon of acute illnesses, many of which are associated with the inappropriate or exaggerated activation of genes involved in inflammation. Finding therapeutic agents which can modulate the inflammatory reaction is the highest priority in medical research today. Drugs developed by the pharmaceutical industry have thus far been associated with toxicity and side effects, which is why natural substances are of increasing interest. Methods: A literature search (PubMed) showed almost 1500 papers dealing with curcumin, most from recent years. All available abstracts were read. Approximately 300 full papers were reviewed. Results: Curcumin, a component of turmeric, has been shown to be non-toxic, to have antioxidant activity, and to inhibit such mediators of inflammation as NFB, cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2), lipooxygenase (LOX), and inducible nitric oxide synthase (iNOS). Significant preventive and/or curative effects have been observed in experimental animal models of a number of diseases, including arteriosclerosis, cancer, diabetes, respiratory, hepatic, pancreatic, intestinal and gastric diseases, neurodegenerative and eye diseases. Conclusions: Turmeric, an approved food additive, or its component curcumin, has shown surprisingly beneficial effects in experimental studies of acute and chronic diseases characterized by an exaggerated inflammatory reaction. There is ample evidence to support its clinical use, both as a prevention and a treatment. Several natural substances have greater antioxidant effects than conventional vitamins, including various polyphenols, flavonoids and curcumenoids. Natural substances [...]

12/27/2005 New York, NY Gina Kolata New York Times (www.nytimes.com) Jay Weinstein found out that he had chronic myelogenous leukemia in 1996, two weeks before his marriage. He was a New York City firefighter, and he thought his health was great. He learned that there was little hope for a cure. The one treatment that could save him was a bone marrow transplant, but that required a donor, and he did not have one. By 1999, his disease was nearing its final, fatal phase. He might have just weeks to live. Then, Mr. Weinstein had a stroke of luck. He managed to become one of the last patients to enroll in a preliminary study at the Oregon Health & Science University, testing an experimental drug. Mr. Weinstein is alive today and still taking the drug, now on the market as Gleevec. Its maker, Novartis, supplies it to him free because he participated in the clinical trial. Dr. Brian Druker, a Howard Hughes investigator at the university's Cancer Institute, who led the Gleevec study, sees Mr. Weinstein as a pioneer in a new frontier of science. His treatment was based not on blasting cancer cells with harsh chemotherapy or radiation but instead on using a sort of molecular razor to cut them out. That, Dr. Druker and others say, is the first fruit of a new understanding of cancer as a genetic disease. But if cancer is a genetic disease, it is like no other in medicine. With cancer, a person [...]