{"id":9739,"date":"2010-11-07T09:30:32","date_gmt":"2010-11-07T16:30:32","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/oralcancernews.org\/wp\/?p=9739"},"modified":"2010-11-07T09:39:03","modified_gmt":"2010-11-07T16:39:03","slug":"oropharyngeal-cancer-epidemic-and-human-papillomavirus","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/oralcancernews.org\/wp\/oropharyngeal-cancer-epidemic-and-human-papillomavirus\/","title":{"rendered":"Oropharyngeal cancer epidemic and human papillomavirus"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Source: www.foodconsumer.org<br \/>\nAuthors: Torbj\u00f6rn Ramqvist and Tina Dalianis<\/p>\n<p><strong>Abstract<\/strong><br \/>\nA growing body of research shows that human papillomavirus (HPV) is a common and increasing cause of oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC). Thus, the International Agency for Research against Cancer has acknowledged HPV as a risk factor for OSCC, in addition to smoking and alcohol consumption. Recently, in Finland, the United Kingdom, the Netherlands, the United States, and Sweden, incidence of OSCC has increased, and an increase in the proportion of HPV-positive tumors was noted. On the basis of these data and reports indicating that patients with HPV-positive cancer have their first sexual experience at a young age and have multiple partners, we postulate that increased incidence of OSCC in the United States and some countries in northern Europe is because of a new, primarily sexually transmitted HPV epidemic. We also suggest that individualized treatment modalities and preventive vaccination should be further explored.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Study<\/strong><br \/>\nIn many countries, vaccines against some human papillomavirus (HPV) types are now administered to girls and young women with the goal of protecting them against HPV-induced cervical cancer (1,2). The introduction of HPV vaccines has also drawn more attention to the fact that HPV is associated not only with cervical cancer and genital warts but also with other tumors, such as head neck and anogenital cancers (3). We focus on the role of HPV in the increased incidence of oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC), the head and neck cancer in which HPV is most commonly found (4).<\/p>\n<p>Head and neck cancer most commonly is of the squamous cell carcinoma type (HNSCC) and includes cancers of the oral cavity, oropharynx, hypopharynx, larynx, sinonasal tract, and nasopharynx. HNSCC is the sixth most common type of cancer in the world; almost 600,000 cases are reported annually, and of these, \u224810% (or more for some geographic locations) are OSCC (5). Globally, the incidence and localization of HNSCC varies widely. It is the most common form of cancer in India, and incidence is higher in countries in Latin America than in the United States and northern Europe. In addition, men are generally more often affected than women. Smoking, alcohol consumption, and betel chewing are traditional risk factors for HNSCC and OSCC (6). However, during the past decade several reports have documented HPV in OSCC (7\u20139). HPV infection, with dominance of HPV16 infection, has therefore been acknowledged by the International Agency for Research against Cancer as a risk factor for OSCC (10). Moreover, there are accumulating reports from many countries that the incidence of OSCC is increasing. We suggest that this increase is caused by a slow epidemic of HPV infection\u2013induced OSCC.<\/p>\n<p><strong>OSCC<\/strong><br \/>\nTonsillar cancer is the most common OSCC, followed by base of tongue cancer. Together, these 2 cancers account for 90% of all OSCCs (6,9). Patients usually do not seek counseling until the tumors are large because small tumors cause little distress and may not be noticed by the patient. Curative treatment implies surgery, radiotherapy, and chemotherapy; the goal is to cause as little functional and cosmetic damage as possible (6,9). If a cure cannot be obtained, palliative therapy is given to treat pain and discomfort. Similar to HNSCC, in general, survival rates for patients with OSCC are poor. Patients with OSCC have an overall 5-year survival rate of \u224825% (6,9). Furthermore, even when standardized treatment is used and tumors are at the same stage and have similar histologic features, it is difficult to predict the outcome. Several reports now describe the incidence of OSCC as increasing and indicate that HPV-positive OSCC has a better clinical outcome than HPV-negative OSCC (7\u20139,11\u201319). Thus, predictive and prognostic markers would be of clinical value for prevention and treatment of OSCC.<\/p>\n<p><strong>HPV<\/strong><br \/>\nThere are &gt;100 HPV types, some found in skin warts and others in mucous tissues, and the association of different HPV types with cervical, some anogenital, and head and neck cancers is well established (3). The 8-kb, double-stranded, circular DNA HPV genome, enclosed in a 52\u201355 nm viral capsid, codes for the L1 and L2 viral capsid proteins and for the E1\u2013E2 and E4\u2013E7 proteins, which play major roles in gene regulation, replication, pathogenesis, and transformation (3). In high-risk HPVs (i.e., those that are more likely to cause lesions that may develop into cancer [www.cancer.gov\/cancertopics\/factsheet\/Risk\/HPV]), E6 and E7 deregulate cell cycle control by E6 binding and degradation of p53, and E7 binds and inhibits the function of the retinoblastoma protein (Rb) (3). The L1 protein can self-assemble into virus-like particles, which form the basis of both currently approved vaccines against HPV infection (1\u20133).<br \/>\nHPV and Methods for Detection in OSCC<\/p>\n<p>During the past few decades, HPV DNA has been detected in \u224825% of HNSCCs overall, but especially in OSCC, for which 45%\u2013100% cases were reported to be HPV positive (7\u20139,11\u201319). The latter variation may depend on OSCC location, the type of specimens available, the techniques used for testing, and the time period and country from which the sample material was obtained (7\u20139,11\u201319).<\/p>\n<p>Analysis of HPV DNA was (and still is) performed primarily by using formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissue, in which the DNA can be partially degraded. It is now widely accepted that it is easier to detect longer HPV DNA fragments in fresh or fresh-frozen material, although newer techniques are more sensitive. Many early studies during the 1980s were based on Southern blot techniques or in situ hybridization for detection of HPV.<\/p>\n<p>Since the 1990s, virology laboratories used PCR for detection of HPV DNA (20\u201323). Screening for HPV was initially performed by using general PCR primers for HPV, which enabled detection of several HPV types (21\u201323). PCR of a control cellular gene was used to assess the DNA quality of samples. These techniques are robust and are still used but need additional methods for HPV typing. There are now many other methods that directly determine the presence of several different HPV types. The Food and Drug Administration\u2013approved Hybrid Capture II (Digene Corporation, Gaithersburg, MD, USA) detects 5 low-risk and 13 high-risk HPV types and uses the fact that HPV DNA hybridizes with synthetic RNA probes complementary to DNA sequences from specific HPV types (20). An assay used in several studies, the Roche (Basel, Switzerland) linear array HPV Genotyping Test, detects 37 HPV types and is based on a method developed by Gravitt et al. (24). In this method, HPV PCR products are hybridized to a linear array of type specific probes. Recently, Schmitt et al developed a sensitive bead-based multiplex method, originally set up for 22 different HPV types but later expanded, in which HPV PCR products are coupled to type-specific probes on beads and analyzed by using Luminex (25).<\/p>\n<p>To assay for biologic activity of HPV in tumors, analysis of E6 and E7 expression by detecting E6 and E7 mRNA by reverse transcription followed by real-time PCR is also often performed (13). In pathology departments, HPV screening is often conducted by in situ hybridization, and in some instances p16 immunohistochemical analysis is used as a substitute to assay for biologically active HPV because there is a correlation between the presence of HPV and overexpression of p16 (26,27).<br \/>\nHPV in OSCC<\/p>\n<p>When HPV in OSCC became more obvious, several studies concentrated on characterizing HPV-positive OSCC (4,7\u20139,11\u201319). HPV type 16 was highly prevalent (\u224890%) in OSCC in all studies; other HPV types (e.g., HPV-31, -33, -58, -59, -62, and -72) were less common, and HPV was demonstrated to be episomal or integrated into the cellular genome (14,28).<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: left;\">In several studies, E6 and E7 expression in OSCC were shown, suggesting that HPV was actively involved in the etiology of the tumors (13). In addition, the association of p16 overexpression with HPV was a further indicator of active E7 because of E7-induced cell cycle activation and upregulation of p16 by inactivating the Rb pathway (3,26,27). HPV-positive tumors were also less likely to have mutated p53 (7) and were more frequently aneuploid and less differentiated than HPV-negative tumors (29). Furthermore, comparative genomic hybridization indicated that HPV-positive tonsillar cancer, in contrast to HPV-negative cancer, often showed chromosome 3q amplification similar to that in HPV-positive cervical and vulvar cancer, which further supports the oncogenic role of HPV in OSCC (30).<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: left;\"><a href=\"http:\/\/oralcancernews.org\/wp\/wp-content\/uploads\/2010\/11\/fig1a.png\"><\/a><a href=\"http:\/\/oralcancernews.org\/wp\/wp-content\/uploads\/2010\/11\/fig1a.png\"><img decoding=\"async\" class=\"aligncenter size-large wp-image-9745\" title=\"fig1a\" src=\"http:\/\/oralcancernews.org\/wp\/wp-content\/uploads\/2010\/11\/fig1a-500x374.png\" alt=\"\" width=\"500\" height=\"374\" srcset=\"https:\/\/oralcancernews.org\/wp\/wp-content\/uploads\/2010\/11\/fig1a-450x336.png 450w, https:\/\/oralcancernews.org\/wp\/wp-content\/uploads\/2010\/11\/fig1a-500x374.png 500w, https:\/\/oralcancernews.org\/wp\/wp-content\/uploads\/2010\/11\/fig1a.png 707w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 500px) 100vw, 500px\" \/><\/a><\/p>\n<p>It was also observed that patients with HPV-positive OSCC were  younger and lacked the traditional risk factors of smoking and alcohol  consumption (7\u20139,13,17). Moreover, a major feature, noted in several  studies, was that HPV was a favorable prognostic factor for clinical  outcome of OSCC, as demonstrated in Figure 1 (7\u20139,11\u201319). This finding  was independent of tumor stage, age, gender, grade of differentiation,  p53 immunohistochemical results, or DNA ploidy (7\u20139). However, Lindquist  et al. (13) observed that patients with HPV-positive tonsillar cancer  who had never smoked had a better prognosis than those who were smokers,  and this observation was recently confirmed by Ang et al. (16). The  reasons for this finding are most likely complex and should be  investigated further. One could speculate, for example, that HPV induces  an immune response and that smoking abrogates this response. A  different option is that smoking and HPV in combination induce a  different category of tumors and that smoking induces additional genetic  alterations in these tumors, as was also suggested by Ang et al. (16).<\/p>\n<p>In general, the prognostic value of HPV status is for OSCC and not  for HNSCC. In some studies with conflicting findings, the prognostic  value of HPV was determined for all HNSCC anatomic sites (9). However,  because there are differences in survival rates and presence of HPV at  different locations, even for OSCC, studies should be performed per  location.<\/p>\n<p>In summary, the accumulated data suggest different entities of OSCC,  where some primarily depend on smoking and alcohol and others on HPV  infection. It is also likely that there are combined etiologies.  Nevertheless, patients with HPV-positive OSCC consistently have a better  prognosis (7\u20139,11\u201319).<strong><br \/>\n<\/strong><\/p>\n<p><strong>An HPV-induced Epidemic of OSCC<\/strong><br \/>\nWe suggest the increased incidence of OSCC depends on HPV infection and  results in an increased proportion of HPV-positive OSCCs. During the  past decades, studies from the United States, Finland, Sweden, the  Netherlands, the United Kingdom, and Scotland showed an increase in the  incidence of OSCC, tonsillar cancer, and base of tongue cancer (31\u201336).  In addition, during the past 10 years, an increase in the proportion of  HPV-positive OSCC has been reported, and we speculate that this is not  caused simply by use of more sensitive diagnostic techniques. In many of  these studies the same assay was used when studying OSCC over time  (12,18,19). Furthermore, the general PCR amplifiability of the DNA from  the older tested samples was also validated.<\/p>\n<p>Using the Swedish Cancer Registry, which covers basically all cancer  cases in Sweden for 1970\u20132002, we disclosed a 2.8-fold increase  (2.6-fold for men and 3.5-fold for women) in the incidence of tonsillar  cancer in the Stockholm area (12), where 25%\u201330% of all patients in  Sweden with tonsillar cancer are treated. In parallel, we examined all  237 available samples from the 515 patients with tonsillar cancer in  Stockholm during the same period and found a 2.9-fold increase in the  proportion of HPV-positive tonsillar cancer from 23% to 68% (12). We  thus suggested HPV infection played a role in the increase of this  disease (12).<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"http:\/\/oralcancernews.org\/wp\/wp-content\/uploads\/2010\/11\/fig2a.png\"><img decoding=\"async\" class=\"aligncenter size-large wp-image-9747\" title=\"fig2a\" src=\"http:\/\/oralcancernews.org\/wp\/wp-content\/uploads\/2010\/11\/fig2a-500x394.png\" alt=\"\" width=\"500\" height=\"394\" srcset=\"https:\/\/oralcancernews.org\/wp\/wp-content\/uploads\/2010\/11\/fig2a-450x355.png 450w, https:\/\/oralcancernews.org\/wp\/wp-content\/uploads\/2010\/11\/fig2a-500x394.png 500w, https:\/\/oralcancernews.org\/wp\/wp-content\/uploads\/2010\/11\/fig2a.png 708w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 500px) 100vw, 500px\" \/><\/a><\/p>\n<p>In continuation of the above study, we followed the incidence of  tonsillar and base of tongue cancer in Stockholm in the Swedish Cancer  Registry and demonstrated a substantial increase for both tumor types  during 1970\u20132006, as shown in Figure 2 (18,19,34). We then performed a  follow-up study in the Stockholm area of the prevalence of HPV in  tonsillar cancer during 2003\u20132007; using the Swedish Cancer Registry, we  identified 120 patients (18). Using the same methods as in the first  study, we found that the proportion of HPV-positive cancers in the 98  available pretreatment biopsy specimens had significantly increased both  from 1970 through 2007 (p&lt;0.0001) and from 2000 through 2007  (p&lt;0.01). During the last 2 years of the study (2006\u20132007), 93% of  all tonsillar cancer was HPV positive. Moreover, the incidence of  HPV-positive tumors almost doubled each decade during 1970\u20132007,  indicating a 7-fold increase over the whole period; in parallel, a  decline of HPV-negative tumors was observed (Figure 3).<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"http:\/\/oralcancernews.org\/wp\/wp-content\/uploads\/2010\/11\/fig3a.png\"><img decoding=\"async\" class=\"aligncenter size-large wp-image-9748\" title=\"fig3a\" src=\"http:\/\/oralcancernews.org\/wp\/wp-content\/uploads\/2010\/11\/fig3a-500x302.png\" alt=\"\" width=\"500\" height=\"302\" srcset=\"https:\/\/oralcancernews.org\/wp\/wp-content\/uploads\/2010\/11\/fig3a-450x271.png 450w, https:\/\/oralcancernews.org\/wp\/wp-content\/uploads\/2010\/11\/fig3a-500x302.png 500w, https:\/\/oralcancernews.org\/wp\/wp-content\/uploads\/2010\/11\/fig3a.png 786w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 500px) 100vw, 500px\" \/><\/a><\/p>\n<p>Shortly  afterwards, we demonstrated that the prevalence of HPV-positive base of  tongue cancer also had increased in the Stockholm area during 1998\u20132007  (19). When we analyzed 95 pretreatment biopsy specimens from base of  tongue SCC from the 109 patients reported during 1998\u20132007 in the  Swedish Cancer Registry in a similar way as above, we found an increase  in the proportion of HPV-positive tumors from 54% in 1998\u20131999 to 84% in  2006\u20132007. The strength of the above studies is that the Swedish Cancer  Registry covers all cancer cases in Sweden and that we have analyzed  all available pretreatment diagnostic biopsy specimens for HPV. The  limitation of our study is that Sweden is a small country with only 9  million inhabitants. Covering almost the same time period as above,  Chaturvedi et al. reported an increase in the proportion of potentially  HPV-related OSCC in the United States (35). However, the previous year,  Sturgis and Cinciripini had already proposed a possible emerging  epidemic of HPV-associated cancers (11). More recently, Marur et al.  reviewed many studies, further supporting an increase in OSCC (17).  Notably, it was also suggested that the increase in OSCC occurs mainly  in men (17). However, using the Swedish Cancer Registry, in the  Stockholm area, Hammarstedt et al. observed also an increase of OSCC in  women (12). It is necessary to acknowledge that the numbers of women  with OSCC are more limited and that it could be more difficult to  identify major changes in this group. The possible causes for this  increase have been discussed extensively and have focused on changes in  sexual patterns, such as increased oral sex or increasing numbers of sex  partners. A significant association has been shown between HPV-positive  tonsillar cancer and early initial sex or number of oral or vaginal sex  partners (37). Furthermore, in a recent study by D&#8217;Souza et al., it was  shown that the risk of developing oral HPV infection increased with  increases in lifetime oral or vaginal sex partners (38). It has also  been reported that not only oral sex, but also open-mouthed kissing, was  associated to the development of oral HPV infection (38). In this  study, 2 study populations were included, one (332 patients) consisted  of a control patient group &gt;18 years of age from the Johns Hopkins  outpatient otolaryngology clinic (2000\u20132006) enrolled in 2 case\u2013control  studies within a prospective cohort with HNSCC. The other (210 students)  consisted of students &gt;17 years of age recruited from the campuses  of Towson University and the University of Maryland in 2007. The latter  study may have had some limitations because it was not population based,  and data for open-mouthed kissing for control patients and smoking for  college students were absent. Nevertheless, this study suggests that  oral-to-oral contact may play a role for oral HPV transmission and could  play a major role in timing of prophylactic vaccination of children.<\/p>\n<p>Several reports show an increase in OSCC and the proportion of  HPV-positive OSCC and an association of the latter to early sex debut  and many partners. Thus, we suggest that we are encountering a slow  epidemic of mainly sexually transmitted HPV-induced OSCC.<\/p>\n<p><strong>HPV in OSCC and Consequences for Treatment and Prevention<\/strong><br \/>\nThe possibility that we are dealing with an HPV-induced epidemic of OSCC  warrants special attention. For example, in Stockholm, the incidence of  HPV-positive tonsillar cancer has increased 7-fold over 30 years (18).  OSCC now accounts for approximately one third of all HNSCC cases  annually in Sweden. The fact that HNSCC in general is decreasing, and  OSCC is increasing, may in 10 years result in OSCC accounting for half  of all HNSCCs in Sweden, and similar trends are likely elsewhere, e.g.,  the United States, United Kingdom, the Netherlands, and Finland. It is  also known that patients with HPV-positive OSCC are younger and have a  better prognosis than HNSCC patients and patients with HPV-negative OSCC  (7,8). In contrast, because of the poor prognosis for HNSCC and, in the  past for OSCC, therapeutic measures have recently been intensified with  induction chemotherapy, hyperfractionated radiotherapy, surgery, and  occasional use of epidermal growth factor receptor inhibitors. This  intensified therapy results in more severe acute and chronic side  effects, such as difficulties in swallowing or talking, dry mouth, and  necrosis of the jawbone, and is also more expensive for society.  Accordingly, it is possible that increasing numbers of OSCC patients  with a better prognosis are being treated with intensified therapy. As a  result, many patients have substantial chronic unnecessary side  effects. It is therefore necessary to identify which patients need and  which do not need intensified treatment, both to increase patient  survival times and quality of life and for the socioeconomic benefit of  society.<\/p>\n<p>Several reports have been published and other studies are ongoing to  assess which molecular factors, such as p16, p53, and others, besides  the presence of HPV in OSCC, can best predict clinical outcome and which  treatments are optimal according to the same predictive markers  (7\u20139,17,26). Some retrospective reports have suggested that persons with  HPV-positive OSCC have higher response rates to chemotherapy and  radiation; however, in other reports this has not been confirmed (9,17).  A recent study also observed that tumor HPV status is a strong  independent prognostic factor for survival among patients with  HPV-positive OSCC irrespective of treatment (16). However, in the same  study, among patients with HPV-positive tumors, the risk for death  significantly increased with each additional pack-year of smoking,  independent of treatment modality (16), a result similar to that found  by Lindquist et al. (13).<\/p>\n<p>It has been shown in an experimental setting that HPV-positive tumors  were not more curable on the basis of increased epithelial sensitivity  to cisplatin or radiation therapy (39). Instead, Spanos et al.  demonstrated that radiation and cisplatin induced an immune response to  this antigenic type of cancer. This finding could suggest that the  presence of HPV in a tumor induced by smoking could be of benefit, but  it is possible that smoking also may abrogate the immune response. As  mentioned, the relationship between smoking and HPV and their roles in  OSCC is most likely complex. In future studies, it would therefore be  valuable to obtain more molecular and immunologic information and to  determine if it is a survival benefit to stop smoking during and after  therapy.<\/p>\n<p>Summarizing treatment of OSCC patients, it is obvious that additional  information will be required before it will be possible to guide  treatment decisions for the individual patient on the basis of HPV  status. Nevertheless, there is accumulating evidence that HPV status and  overexpression of p16, and having never smoked, is of benefit. Future  prospective clinical studies, including diagnostics of HPV, molecular  and immunologic profiles, history of smoking, cessation of smoking  during therapy, and effects of different treatment modalities and their  side effects on quality of life, will be of benefit for personalized  treatment.<\/p>\n<p>Finally, it is also essential to keep in mind that we now have  vaccines directed against HPV16, which accounts for \u224880%\u201390% of all  HPV-positive OSCC, at least in Europe and the United States (7\u20139,11\u20139).  Although it will likely take several decades before the effects of HPV  vaccination on cancer incidence will be detected, it is crucial to  monitor the effects of the present HPV vaccination, not only on the  incidence of cervical cancer but also on the incidence of OSCC.<\/p>\n<p>Few if any of other studies have focused on performing isolated  health economic analysis of the effect of HPV on OSCC. However, a recent  study pointed out that there is an improvement of the present  cost-effectiveness of HPV vaccines when the effects on other  HPV-associated tumors cancers are included (40). Furthermore, in  countries with effective cervical cancer screening programs, other  HPV-associated noncervical cancers represent a relatively high  proportion of HPV-positive cancers (15). Considering that OSCC is the  second most common HPV-associated cancer and its incidence is  increasing, the effect of the HPV vaccine on this tumor deserves  attention, and we need to know if future vaccination against HPV  infection should include both women and men.<\/p>\n<p>This work was supported in part by the Swedish Research Council, the  Swedish Cancer Foundation, the Stockholm Cancer Society, the Stockholm  City Council, and the Karolinska Institutet, Sweden.<\/p>\n<p>Dr Ramqvist is a senior researcher and associate professor at the  Karolinska Institutet. His research interests are murine and human  polyomaviruses and human papillomaviruses.<\/p>\n<p>Dr Dalianis is a specialist in clinical virology and immunology and a  professor in tumor virology at the Karolinska Institutet. Her research  interests are human papillomaviruses and murine and human  polyomaviruses.<\/p>\n<p>Author&#8217;s affiliations:  Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden (T.  Ramqvist, T. Dalianis); and Swedish Institute for Infectious Disease  Control, Solna, Sweden (T. Dalianis)<\/p>\n<p><strong>References<\/strong><br \/>\n1. Villa LL, Costa RL, Petta CA, Andrade RP, Ault KA, Giuliano AR, et  al. Prophylactic quadrivalent human papillomavirus (types 6, 11, 16, and  18) L1 virus-like particle vaccine in young women: a randomised  double-blind placebo-controlled multicentre phase II efficacy trial.  Lancet Oncol. 2005;6:271\u20138. PubMed DOI<br \/>\n2. Mu\u00f1oz N, Kjaer SK, Sigurdsson K, Iversen OE, Hernandez-Avila M,  Wheeler CM, et al. Impact of human papillomavirus (HPV)-6\/11\/16\/18  vaccine on all HPV-associated genital diseases in young women. J Natl  Cancer Inst. 2010;102:325\u201339. PubMed DOI<br \/>\n3. Zur Hausen H. Infections causing human cancer. Weinheim (Germany): Wiley-VCH Verlag; 2006. p. 145\u2013243.<br \/>\n4. Syrj\u00e4nen S. Human papillomavirus (HPV) in head and neck cancer. J Clin Virol. 2005;32(Suppl 1):S59\u201366. PubMed DOI<br \/>\n5. Parkin DM, Bray F, Ferlay J, Pisani P. Global cancer statistics, 2002. CA Cancer J Clin. 2005;55:74\u2013108. PubMed DOI<br \/>\n6. Licitra L, Bernier J, Grandi C, Merlano M, Bruzzi P, Lefebvre JL.  Cancer of the oropharynx. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol. 2002;41:107\u201322. PubMed  DOI<br \/>\n7. Gillison ML, Koch WM, Capone RB, Spafford M, Westra WH, Wu L, et al.  Evidence for a causal association between human papillomavirus and a  subset of head and neck cancers. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2000;92:709\u201320.  PubMed DOI<br \/>\n8. Mellin H, Friesland S, Lewensohn R, Dalianis T, Munck-Wikland E.  Human papillomavirus (HPV) DNA in tonsillar cancer: clinical correlates,  risk of relapse, and survival. Int J Cancer. 2000;89:300\u20134.PubMed DOI<br \/>\n9. Dahlstrand HM, Dalianis T. Presence and influence of human  papillomaviruses (HPV) in tonsillar cancer. Adv Cancer Res.  2005;93:59\u201389. PubMed DOI<br \/>\n10. World Health Organization. IARC monographs on the evaluation of  carcinogenic risk to humans. Volume 90. Human papillomaviruses. Lyon  (France): International Agency for Research on Cancer; 2007.<br \/>\n11. Sturgis EM, Cinciripini PM. Trends in head and neck cancer incidence  in relation to smoking prevalence: an emerging epidemic of human  papillomavirus\u2013associated cancers? Cancer. 2007;110:1429\u201335. PubMed DOI<br \/>\n12. Hammarstedt L, Lindquist D, Dahlstrand H, Romanitan M, Dahlgren LO,  Joneberg J, et al. Human papillomavirus as a risk factor for the  increase in incidence of tonsillar cancer. Int J Cancer.  2006;119:2620\u20133. PubMed DOI<br \/>\n13. Lindquist D, Romanitan M, Hammarstedt L, Nasman A, Dahlstrand H,  Lindholm J, et al. Human papillomavirus is a favourable prognostic  factor in tonsillar cancer and its oncogenic role is supported by the  expression of E6 and E7. Mol Oncol. 2007;1:350\u20135. PubMed DOI<br \/>\n14. Mellin H, Dahlgren L, Munck-Wikland E, Lindholm J, Rabbani H,  Kalantari M, et al. Human papillomavirus type 16 is episomal and a high  viral load may be correlated to better prognosis in tonsillar cancer.  Int J Cancer. 2002;102:152\u20138. PubMed DOI<br \/>\n15. Gillison ML, Chaturvedi AK, Lowy DR. HPV prophylactic vaccines and  the potential prevention of noncervical cancers in both men and women.  Cancer. 2008;113(Suppl):3036\u201346. PubMed DOI<br \/>\n16. Ang KK, Harris J, Wheeler R, Weber R, Rosenthal DI, Nguyen-Tan PF,  et al. Human papillomavirus and survival of patients with oropharyngeal  cancer. N Engl J Med. 2010;363:24\u201335. PubMed DOI<br \/>\n17. Marur S, D&#8217;Souza G, Westra WH, Forastiere AA. HPV-associated head  and neck cancer: a virus-related cancer epidemic. Lancet Oncol.  2010;11:781\u20139.PubMed  DOI<br \/>\n18. N\u00e4sman A, Attner P, Hammarstedt L, Du J, Eriksson M, Giraud G, et  al. Incidence of human papillomavirus (HPV) positive tonsillar carcinoma  in Stockholm, Sweden: an epidemic of viral-induced carcinoma? Int J  Cancer. 2009;125:362\u20136. PubMed DOI<br \/>\n19. Attner P, Du J, Nasman A, Hammarstedt L, Ramqvist T, Lindholm J, et  al. The role of human papillomavirus in the increased incidence of base  of tongue cancer. Int J Cancer. 2010;126:2879\u201384.<br \/>\n20. Clavel C, Masure M, Bory JP, Putaud I, Mangeonjean C, Lorenzato M,  et al. Hybrid Capture II-based human papillomavirus detection, a  sensitive test to detect in routine high-grade cervical lesions: a  preliminary study on 1518 women. Br J Cancer. 1999;80:1306\u201311. PubMed  DOI<br \/>\n21. de Roda Husman AM, Walboomers JM, van den Brule AJ, Meijer CJ,  Snijders PJ. The use of general primers GP5 and GP6 elongated at their  3\u2032 ends with adjacent highly conserved sequences improves human  papillomavirus detection by PCR. J Gen Virol. 1995;76:1057\u201362. PubMed  DOI<br \/>\n22. Tieben LM, ter Schegget J, Minnaar RP, Bouwes Bavinck JN, Berkhout  RJ, Vermeer BJ, et al. Detection of cutaneous and genital HPV types in  clinical samples by PCR using consensus primers. J Virol Methods.  1993;42:265\u201379. PubMed DOI<br \/>\n23. van den Brule AJ, Pol R, Fransen-Daalmeijer N, Schouls LM, Meijer  CJ, Snijders PJ. GP5+\/6+ PCR followed by reverse line blot analysis  enables rapid and high-throughput identification of human papillomavirus  genotypes. J Clin Microbiol. 2002;40:779\u201387. PubMed DOI<br \/>\n24. Gravitt PE, Peyton CL, Apple RJ, Wheeler CM. Genotyping of 27 human  papillomavirus types by using L1 consensus PCR products by a  single-hybridization, reverse line blot detection method. J Clin  Microbiol. 1998;36:3020\u20137.<br \/>\n25. Schmitt M, Bravo IG, Snijders PJ, Gissmann L, Pawlita M, Waterboer  T. Bead-based multiplex genotyping of human papillomaviruses. J Clin  Microbiol. 2006;44:504\u201312. PubMed DOI<br \/>\n26. Mellin Dahlstrand H, Lindquist D, Bjornestal L, Ohlsson A, Dalianis  T, Munck-Wikland E, et al.P16(INK4a) correlates to human papillomavirus  presence, response to radiotherapy and clinical outcome in tonsillar  carcinoma. Anticancer Res. 2005;25(6C):4375\u201383.<br \/>\n27. Singhi AD, Westra WH. Comparison of human papillomavirus in situ  hybridization and p16 immunohistochemistry in the detection of human  papillomavirus\u2013associated head and neck cancer based on a prospective  clinical experience. Cancer. 2010;116:2166\u201373.<br \/>\n28. Koskinen WJ, Chen RW, Leivo I, Makitie A, Back L, Kontio R, et al.  Prevalence and physical status of human papillomavirus in squamous cell  carcinomas of the head and neck. Int J Cancer. 2003;107:401\u20136. PubMed  DOI<br \/>\n29. Mellin H, Friesland S, Auer G, Dalianis T, Munck-Wikland E. Human  papillomavirus and DNA ploidy in tonsillar cancer\u2014correlation to  prognosis. Anticancer Res. 2003;23(3C):2821\u20138.<br \/>\n30. Dahlgren L, Mellin H, Wangsa D, Heselmeyer-Haddad K, Bjornestal L,  Lindholm J, et al. Comparative genomic hybridization analysis of  tonsillar cancer reveals a different pattern of genomic imbalances in  human papillomavirus\u2013positive and \u2013negative tumors. Int J Cancer.  2003;107:244\u20139. PubMed DOI<br \/>\n31. Braakhuis BJ, Visser O, Leemans CR. Oral and oropharyngeal cancer in  the Netherlands between 1989 and 2006: increasing incidence, but not in  young adults. Oral Oncol. 2009;45:e85\u20139. PubMedDOI<br \/>\n32. Conway DI, Stockton DL, Warnakulasuriya KA, Ogden G, Macpherson LM.  Incidence of oral and oropharyngeal cancer in United Kingdom  (1990\u20131999)\u2014recent trends and regional variation. Oral Oncol.  2006;42:586\u201392. PubMed DOI<br \/>\n33. Robinson KL, Macfarlane GJ. Oropharyngeal cancer incidence and  mortality in Scotland: are rates still increasing? Oral Oncol.  2003;39:31\u20136. PubMed DOI<br \/>\n34. Hammarstedt L, Dahlstrand H, Lindquist D, Onelov L, Ryott M, Luo J,  et al. The incidence of tonsillar cancer in Sweden is increasing. Acta  Otolaryngol. 2007;127:988\u201392. PubMed DO<br \/>\n35. Chaturvedi AK, Engels EA, Anderson WF, Gillison ML. Incidence trends  for human papillomavirus\u2013related and \u2013unrelated oral squamous cell  carcinomas in the United States. J Clin Oncol. 2008;26:612\u20139. PubMed DOI<br \/>\n36. Syrj\u00e4nen S. HPV infections and tonsillar carcinoma. J Clin Pathol. 2004;57:449\u201355. PubMed DOI<br \/>\n37. Anaya-Saavedra G, Ramirez-Amador V, Irigoyen-Camacho ME,  Garcia-Cuellar CM, Guido-Jimenez M, Mendez-Martinez R, et al. High  association of human papillomavirus infection with oral cancer: a  case\u2013control study. Arch Med Res. 2008;39:189\u201397. PubMed DOI<br \/>\n38. D&#8217;Souza G, Agrawal Y, Halpern J, Bodison S, Gillison ML. Oral sexual  behaviors associated with prevalent oral human papillomavirus  infection. J Infect Dis. 2009;199:1263\u20139. PubMed DOI<br \/>\n39. Spanos WC, Nowicki P, Lee DW, Hoover A, Hostager B, Gupta A, et al.  Immune response during therapy with cisplatin or radiation for human  papillomavirus\u2013related head and neck cancer. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck  Surg. 2009;135:1137\u201346. PubMed DOI<br \/>\n40. Chesson HW, Ekwueme DU, Saraiya M, Markowitz LE. Cost-effectiveness  of human papillomavirus vaccination in the United States. Emerg Infect  Dis. 2008;14:244\u201351. PubMed DOI<\/p>\n<p>Source:<br \/>\n<em>Emerg Infect Dis<\/em> [serial on the Internet]. 2010 Nov<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\">\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Source: www.foodconsumer.org Authors: Torbj\u00f6rn Ramqvist and Tina Dalianis Abstract A growing body of research shows that human papillomavirus (HPV) is a common and increasing cause of oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC). Thus, the International Agency for Research against Cancer has acknowledged HPV as a risk factor for OSCC, in addition to smoking and alcohol consumption. Recently, in Finland, the United Kingdom, the Netherlands, the United States, and Sweden, incidence of OSCC has increased, and an increase in the proportion of HPV-positive tumors was noted. On the basis of these data and reports indicating that patients with HPV-positive cancer have their first sexual experience at a young age and have multiple partners, we postulate that increased incidence of OSCC in the United States and some countries in northern Europe is because of a new, primarily sexually transmitted HPV epidemic. We also suggest that individualized treatment modalities and preventive vaccination should be further explored. Study In many countries, vaccines against some human papillomavirus (HPV) types are now administered to girls and young women with the goal of protecting them against HPV-induced cervical cancer (1,2). The introduction of HPV vaccines has also drawn more attention to the fact that HPV is associated not only with cervical cancer and genital warts but also with other tumors, such as head neck and anogenital cancers (3). We focus on the role of HPV in the increased incidence of oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC), the head and neck cancer in which HPV is most commonly found (4).  [&#8230;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[179,80,91,206,105,406],"class_list":["post-9739","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-oral_cancer_news","tag-alcohol","tag-hpv","tag-hpv16","tag-human-papillomavirus","tag-smoking","tag-vaccination"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/oralcancernews.org\/wp\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/9739","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/oralcancernews.org\/wp\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/oralcancernews.org\/wp\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/oralcancernews.org\/wp\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/oralcancernews.org\/wp\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=9739"}],"version-history":[{"count":9,"href":"https:\/\/oralcancernews.org\/wp\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/9739\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":9753,"href":"https:\/\/oralcancernews.org\/wp\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/9739\/revisions\/9753"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/oralcancernews.org\/wp\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=9739"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/oralcancernews.org\/wp\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=9739"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/oralcancernews.org\/wp\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=9739"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}