{"id":11099,"date":"2011-05-19T13:43:34","date_gmt":"2011-05-19T20:43:34","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/oralcancernews.org\/wp\/?p=11099"},"modified":"2011-05-19T13:43:34","modified_gmt":"2011-05-19T20:43:34","slug":"yale-school-of-medicine-researchers-take-a-closer-look-at-smart-drugs","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/oralcancernews.org\/wp\/yale-school-of-medicine-researchers-take-a-closer-look-at-smart-drugs\/","title":{"rendered":"Yale School of Medicine Researchers take a closer look at &#8220;smart drugs&#8221;"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Source: Yale University<\/p>\n<p>Some of the most effective and expensive cancer drugs, dubbed &#8220;smart  drugs&#8221; for their ability to stop tumors by targeting key drivers of  cancer cell growth, are not effective in some patients. In two related  studies, Yale School of Medicine researchers examined one such driver,  the EGF receptor (EGFR), and found that a decoy receptor might be  limiting the amount of drug that gets to the intended target.<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;We know that smart drugs like Cetuximab are not always effective in  the cancer cells they&#8217;re supposed to target because there are no  positive predictive markers for selecting the patients who will benefit  from treatment with EGFR-targeted therapies, including EGFR itself,&#8221;  said lead author Nita Maihle, professor in the Departments of  Obstetrics, Gynecology &amp; Reproductive Sciences and of Pathology at  Yale School of Medicine. &#8220;Why would a patient be given an expensive drug  if it doesn&#8217;t work? Our studies provide new insight into this  paradoxical EGFR testing conundrum.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>In a study published recently in the journal <em>Cancer<\/em>, Maihle  and her team isolated a protein from human blood that looks like EGFR,  but is actually a closely related variant called serum sEGFR. They  showed that Cetuximab binds equally as well to serum sEGFR as it does to  the intended EGFR cancer target.<\/p>\n<p>Those study results showed that sEGFR might act as a decoy receptor  in the blood of cancer patients, tying up Cetuximab and therefore  limiting the amount of Cetuximab that actually gets to the intended  target.<\/p>\n<p>Such limitations may, in part, provide an explanation for the  failure of two large phase III clinical trials on Cetuximab in  colorectal cancer patients, since serum sEGFR concentrations are highly  variable in cancer patients. These studies suggest that serum sEGFR  should be measured and considered prior to treatment with Cetuximab.  Other research has supported this concept by showing that serum sEGFR  concentration changes in response to treatment with Cetuximab.<\/p>\n<p>In their second related study, published online in the current issue  of the journal Biochemistry, Maihle and her team show that newly  developed reagents to measure sEGFR in blood and other human tissues can  detect a second unrelated cell surface protein in tumor cells: alpha-5  integrin.<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;This important finding suggests that the naturally occurring sEGFR  protein may play a complex role in cell adhesion and migration\u2014two  cellular processes important in the spread of cancer,&#8221; said Maihle, who  is a member of Yale Cancer Center. &#8220;Together these studies demonstrate  an unanticipated level of complexity in EGFR signaling and assay  development, and suggest new ways to overcome current challenges  associated with clinical testing for this important cancer target.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Source: Yale University Some of the most effective and expensive cancer drugs, dubbed &#8220;smart drugs&#8221; for their ability to stop tumors by targeting key drivers of cancer cell growth, are not effective in some patients. In two related studies, Yale School of Medicine researchers examined one such driver, the EGF receptor (EGFR), and found that a decoy receptor might be limiting the amount of drug that gets to the intended target. &#8220;We know that smart drugs like Cetuximab are not always effective in the cancer cells they&#8217;re supposed to target because there are no positive predictive markers for selecting the patients who will benefit from treatment with EGFR-targeted therapies, including EGFR itself,&#8221; said lead author Nita Maihle, professor in the Departments of Obstetrics, Gynecology &amp; Reproductive Sciences and of Pathology at Yale School of Medicine. &#8220;Why would a patient be given an expensive drug if it doesn&#8217;t work? Our studies provide new insight into this paradoxical EGFR testing conundrum.&#8221; In a study published recently in the journal Cancer, Maihle and her team isolated a protein from human blood that looks like EGFR, but is actually a closely related variant called serum sEGFR. They showed that Cetuximab binds equally as well to serum sEGFR as it does to the intended EGFR cancer target. Those study results showed that sEGFR might act as a decoy receptor in the blood of cancer patients, tying up Cetuximab and therefore limiting the amount of Cetuximab that actually gets to the intended target. Such limitations may,  [&#8230;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[1429,608,258,360,3089,3088],"class_list":["post-11099","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-oral_cancer_news","tag-cancer-drugs","tag-cancer-patients","tag-cetuximab","tag-egfr","tag-yale-cancer-center","tag-yale-school-of-medicine"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/oralcancernews.org\/wp\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/11099","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/oralcancernews.org\/wp\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/oralcancernews.org\/wp\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/oralcancernews.org\/wp\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/oralcancernews.org\/wp\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=11099"}],"version-history":[{"count":3,"href":"https:\/\/oralcancernews.org\/wp\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/11099\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":11102,"href":"https:\/\/oralcancernews.org\/wp\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/11099\/revisions\/11102"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/oralcancernews.org\/wp\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=11099"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/oralcancernews.org\/wp\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=11099"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/oralcancernews.org\/wp\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=11099"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}