• 12/7/2004
  • Ora Israel et al.
  • Journal of Nuclear Medicine Vol. 45 No. 12 2045-2051

Rising serum tumor markers may be associated with negative imaging in the presence of cancer. CT and 18F-FDG PET may yield incongruent results in the assessment of tumor recurrence. The present study evaluates the incremental role of 18F-FDG PET/CT for the diagnosis and management of cancer patients with increasing levels of tumor markers as the sole indicator of potential recurrence after initial successful treatment.

Methods:
Thirty-six cancer patients with increasing levels of tumor markers during follow-up and negative CT underwent 18F-FDG PET/CT, which showed 111 sites of increased tracer uptake. PET/CT was compared with PET results on a site-based analysis for characterization of 18F-FDG foci and on a patient-based analysis for diagnosis of recurrence. The clinical impact of PET/CT on further patient management was evaluated.

Results:
Thirty patients (83%) had recurrence in 85 malignant sites (77%). For the site-based analysis, PET had a sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of 96%, 50%, 85%, 85%, and 82%, respectively, as compared with the performance indices of PET/CT of 100%, 89%, 97%, 97%, and 100%, respectively. There was a statistically significant difference between the specificity (P < 0.05) and accuracy (P < 0.001) of PET and PET/CT for precise characterization of suspected lesions. For the patient-based analysis, PET had a sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of 93%, 50%, and 86%, respectively, as compared with PET/CT with values of 93%, 67%, and 89%, respectively (P = not significant). PET/CT was the single modality that directed further management and treatment planning in 12 patients (33%).

Conclusion:
The results of this study indicate that PET/CT may improve the accuracy of occult cancer detection and further lead to management changes in patients with increasing levels of tumor markers as the sole suspicion of recurrent malignancy

Authors:
Ora Israel, MD1,2, Maya Mor, MD1, Luda Guralnik, MD3, Nirit Hermoni, MD1, Diana Gaitini, MD2,3, Rachel Bar-Shalom, MD1, Zohar Keidar, MD, PhD1,2 and Ron Epelbaum, MD2,4

Authors’ Affiliations:
1 Department of Nuclear Medicine, Rambam Medical Center, Haifa, Israel
2 The B. Rappaport School of Medicine, Technion, Israel Institute of Technology, Haifa, Israel
3 Department of Diagnostic Imaging, Rambam Medical Center, Haifa, Israel
4 Department of Oncology, Rambam Medical Center, Haifa, Israel thors’ Affiliations: