generique du cialis 
viagra femenino venta 
viagra generico 
natural viagra food list 
cialis générique 
bactrim dosage where to buy renova skin cream can you buy acyclovir cream over the counter synthroid 100 mg efectos secundarios clobetasol propionate cream usp 0.05 for sale indien viagra kamagra acheter cuanto cuesta el viagra en mexico cialis 20mg prix cialis prix discount cephalexin buy uk avodart cialis clomid diflucan dostinex gluco inderal la 60 mg reviews priligy 30 mg/60 mg filmtabletten venlafaxine er 75 mg weight loss cialis viagra levitra kaufen rezeptfrei commander viagra en ligne viagra on line italia cialis prix commande cialis
augmentin 500 prix ventoline en ligne priligy 30 mg ligne

The effect of treating institution on outcomes in head and neck cancer

Wed, Dec 12, 2012

Oral Cancer News

Source: medicalxpress.com

Patients with head and neck cancer receiving radiation treatment at an academic center have a higher survival rate than those receiving treatment at a community center, according to a study in the December 2012 issue of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery.

“Despite similar rates of treatment completion and rate of treatment breaks between groups, patients treated in academic centers had more advanced cancer but better survival,” the authors state in their conclusion.

The study evaluated differences in patient characteristics, treatment, and cancer outcomes in the head and neck cancer population at the University of Minnesota from 2002 through 2008. Data were gathered on demographics, general medical data, tumor variables, insurance type, marital status and health behaviors.

The study analyzed 355 patients with mucosal head and neck cancer treated with radiation therapy from 2002 to 2008. One hundred forty-five (41%) received radiation treatment at community hospitals, and 210 (59%) were treated at academic hospitals. Within the academic hospitals group, 197 underwent radiation at the University of Minnesota, and 13 received radiation at an alternative academic center.

Both treatment groups shared similar characteristics in regard to sex, comorbidity, marital status, work status, insurance, and alcohol use. However, the community group had more current smokers and slightly older patients on average. Patients in the academic group were more likely to live in an urban location and had a higher median income. Patients undergoing radiation treatment at university centers had significantly more advanced cancer. After adjusting for these differences in patient characteristics, patients in the academic hospitals had about two-thirds the risk of dying compared with the community hospitals. The five-year survival rate was 53 percent for patients treated in academic centers compared with 33 percent for patients treated in community settings.

As a result of the study, the authors conclude that “more subtle differences in treatment administration and support at academic centers need to be investigated to understand the survival differences.” In addition, the authors note, “Potential disparities in care related to income, socioeconomic status, and geography should be further explored.”

Source: American Academy of Otolaryngology

Print Friendly
Be Sociable, Share!
, , , , , , , ,

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.