Why the FDA Needs to Start Regulating Lab Tests

Source: modernhealthcare.comAuthor: Merrill Goozner The Food and Drug Administration's proposal to regulate the accuracy of laboratory-developed tests has drawn heated opposition from the laboratory testing industry, hospitals and most medical specialty societies. Only oncologists favor tighter oversight.It's not just cancer docs who should be concerned. We're entering a new era where there will be much more genetic testing. Higher standards are necessary. Since 1988, routine laboratory tests performed inside labs have come under the Clinical Laboratory Improvement Amendments, which has largely exempted them from FDA oversight. Only if a company sold test kits to hospitals or physician offices did the FDA regulate them as medical devices, with attendant performance and manufacturing standards.Until recently, this didn't present much of a problem. Most lab tests are fairly routine—testing blood for cholesterol, sugar or sodium, for instance. A robust industry dominated by large national companies like LabCorp, Quest Diagnostics and ARUP Laboratories provides a market-based solution for ensuring those tests are affordable and high quality. Hospitals and physician offices that conduct their own in-house tests benefit from the exemption, too. Some large institutions that operate their own labs save money because of their economies of scale. Major academic medical center labs operating under CLIA also play a leading role in developing new tests for rare or hard-to-treat conditions.But in recent years, there has been a proliferation of new tests based on genetic information that are being marketed by independent firms making claims that have not been validated by clinical trials or other scientific methods. They claim to show a person's propensity [...]

2015-01-12T12:03:39-07:00January, 2015|Oral Cancer News|

UConn scientist may have way to detect pre-tumor cancer

Source: www.theday.com Author: staff A University of Connecticut researcher thinks he might have found a way to find cancer even before it reveals itself in a tumor or other symptoms. Jim Rusling, professor of chemistry and cell biology at the UConn Health Center, has been working with colleagues at the National Institutes of Health to detect specific proteins found in the blood of those with prostate or oral cancer. These biomarker proteins are detectable in early stages of these cancers, so the researchers believe they can be used for earlier detection and prevention than is now possible. Rusling noted that the approach has an advantage over genetic testing, because that can only assess the risk of getting the disease, whereas measuring biomarkers can reveal the actual presence cancer. He described the project, funded by a $1.5 million NIH grant, in a recent issue of Analytical Chemistry.

In push for cancer screening, limited benefits

Source: nytimes.com Author: Natasha Singer "Don’t forget to check your neck,” says an advertising campaign encouraging people to visit doctors for exams to detect thyroid cancer. In another cancer awareness effort, Representative Debbie Wasserman Schultz, a Florida Democrat, has more than 350 House co-sponsors for her bill to promote the early detection of breast cancer in young women, teaching them about screening methods like self-exams and genetic testing. Meanwhile, the foundation of the American Urological Association has a prostate cancer awareness campaign starring Hall of Fame football players. “Get screened,” Len Dawson, a former Kansas City Chiefs quarterback, says in a public service television spot. “Don’t let prostate cancer take you out of the game.” Nearly every body part susceptible to cancer now has an advocacy group, politician or athlete with a public awareness campaign to promote routine screening tests — even though it is well established that many of these exams offer little benefit for the general public. An upshot of the decades-long war on cancer is the popular belief that healthy people should regularly examine their bodies or undergo screening because early detection saves lives. But in fact, except for a few types of cancer, routine screening has not been proven to reduce the death toll from cancer for people without specific symptoms or risk factors — like a breast lump or a family history of cancer — and could even lead to harm, many experts on health say. That is why the continued rollout of screening campaigns, [...]

Go to Top